The plaintiff, an eleven-year-old girl, lost the use of her thumb as a result of a snowmobile accident. Facts: D built a hay rick near P's property. CitationTrimarco v. Klein, 56 N.Y.2d 98, 436 N.E.2d 502, 451 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3319 (N.Y. May 20, 1982) Brief Fact Summary. A statute existed that would allow persons who did not aid in the rebellion to recover land seized from them in the Reconstruction. Get United States v. Klein, 80 U.S. 128 (1871), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Every Bundle includes the complete text from each of the titles below: PLUS: Hundreds of law school topic-related videos from The Understanding Law Video Lecture Series™: Monthly Subscription ($19 / Month) Annual Subscription ($175 / Year). P showed at trial that there was evidence of custom and usage to show that ordinary glass doors no longer conformed to accepted safety standards and that they were considered hazardous in showers. CITATION CODES. The fact that some types of accidents occur, proves negligent Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. CASE BRIEF . No. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. Copyright (c) 2009 Onelbriefs.com. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Argued November 7, 1966. Adamson v. California A.L.A. Although custom and practice can has definite relevance to whether or not one has acted with due care, it remains a jury question whether one has acted with due care under particular circumstances. * Proof of the existence of a custom and practice coupled with evidence showing adherence to it may establish one has acted with due care. United States v. Klein, (1872). Case Information. May 20, 1982. If you are interested, please contact us at [email protected] Submit Your Case Briefs. Trimarco sued his landlord Klein (D) for his injuries. 62. This is a jury issue; the jury must weigh the usage evidence and the reasonable person standard and decide if the D is negligent. 1978) case opinion from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey Get Robinson v. Lindsay, 598 P.2d 392 (Wash. 1979), Supreme Court of Washington, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Syllabus. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. U.S. Allgeyer v. ... Slaughterhouse Case Slocum v. Donahue Slocum v. Food Fair Stores of Florida Smith v. Colonial Penn Somer v. Kridel ... Topolewski v. State Trimarco v. Klein Tubbs v. Southwestern Bell Co. Twining v. New Jersey United Mine Workers v. Plaintiff suffered severe injuries when the glass of a bathtub he was in shattered. 2. Facts. It had been customary for years to use safety glass, but landlord had not replaced it. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. Decided January 16, 1967. 161) Court and Date: Court of Appels of New York, 1982 (Pg. Klein established that an involuntarily committed, legally competent patient who refused medication had a right to professional medical review of the treating psychiatrist’s decision. Defendants owned the building in which the incident occurred, and had used ordinary glass for the bathtub enclosure despite the common practice of using shatterproof glass in such cases. P warned D that the hay rick was too close to the cottage and that it was likely to catch fire. Instant Facts: Trimarco (P), a tenant of Klein (D), sued the latter for injury that Trimarco (P) suffered when the glass shower door in his apartment broke Facts: Trimarco (P) sued Klein (D), his landlord, for injuries that he suffered when the glass shower door in his apartment broke. Case Summary Facts: Trimarco (P) fell through the glass door enclosing the bathtub in his apartment and suffered severe injuries. 29 In that case the opinion makes a labored and successful effort to show that Padelford, the owner of the property, had secured the benefit of the amnesty proclamation before the property was seized under the same statute we are now considering. Nor do I find persuasive the majority's conclusion that no act of the defendant landlord proximately caused the injuries suffered by plaintiff. Plaintiff sued for his personal injuries. The door was made out of ordinary glass, however, Trimarco assumed it was made out of tempered, shatterproof safety glass. Background. Byrne v. Boadle Case Brief - Rule of Law: Res Ipsa Loquitur means the thing speaks for itself. Issue. Torts • Add Comment-8″?> faultCode 403 faultString Incorrect username or password. Design by Free CSS Templates. 1131 (D.N.J. Full Brief List. 56 N.Y.2d 98 436 N.E.2d 502 451 N.Y.S.2d 52. TRIMARCO v. KLEIN Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Wilson died in 1865 and John Klein, his estate's administrator, sought money held by the Court of Claims established by Congress and initially won his case in 1869. 5 May 20, 1982. Klein v Gutman 2014 NY Slip Op 06949 Decided on October 15, 2014 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. Rennie v. Klein, 462 F. Supp. He appealed stating that he should not be held liable for not possessing "the high… We are looking to hire attorneys to help contribute legal content to our site. P did not know and was not made aware that the door used was made out of ordinary glass and not tempered glass. Torts Standard of Care Case: Trimarco v. Klein (Pg. Facts: Klein was pardoned by the president for aiding in the civil war rebellion. United States v. Klein, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) Brief Fact Summary. D responded that he would chance it. Norman H. Dachs, Mineola, for respondents. He was awarded $240,000 at trial. Trimarco v. Klein COA NY - 1982 Facts: P was a tenant and D was his landlord. Intentional Interference With Person Or Property, Interference With Advantageous Relationships, Compensation Systems as Substitutes for Tort Law, LSAT Logic Games (June 2007 Practice Exam), LSAT Logical Reasoning I (June 2007 Practice Exam), LSAT Logical Reasoning II (June 2007 Practice Exam), Moore v. The Regents of the University of California, Trimarco v. Klein, 56 N.Y.2d 98, 436 N.E.2d 502, 451 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3319 (N.Y. May 20, 1982). 385 U.S. 511. Attorneys Wanted. (20 May, 1982) 20 May, 1982; Subsequent References; Similar Judgments; TRIMARCO v. KLEIN. People v. Klein . P was getting out of the tub when the glass shower door broke and injured him. Previous case law had held that a presidential pardon was conclusive proof that a person had not committed the crime. Trimarco v. Klein case brief summary F: At trial, judgment for tenant. Delair v. McAdoo Supreme Court of PA - 1936 Facts: D was passing P on a road when his tire blew out and caused him to hit P. P sued D to recover damages as a result of the accident. When custom and practice have removed certain dangers, the custom may be used as evidence that one has failed to act as is required under the circumstances. 8 After the accident it was determined that the glass was ordinary glass. The driver of the snowmobile was a thirteen-year-old boy. Vincent N. TRIMARCO et al., Appellants, v. Irving KLEIN et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business as Glenbriar Company, Respondents. Trimarco v. Klein Case Brief - Rule of Law: When custom and practice have removed certain dangers, the custom may be used as evidence that one has failed to act However, even after such custom and practice are established, adherence or non-adherence thereto is not conclusive proof of liability or innocence. Vaughan seeks damages in negligence. Brief. Facts. Evidence of custom and usage may be used to show that person may have fallen below the reasonable standard of care. (Havas v Victory Paper Stock Co., 49 N.Y.2d 381, 388; see Dobess Realty Corp. v City of New York, 79 A.D.2d 348, 354-355 [app pending]; Triggs v Advance Trucking Corp., 23 A.D.2d 777.) Get Brewer v. Murray, 292 P.3d 41 (2012), Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. When a child causes injury by engaging in dangerous or adult conduct, they are held to an adult standard of care. P … P was a tenant and D was his landlord. Appellate Division reversed, found for D. COA NY reversed, new trial ordered, found for P. Can a P offer evidence of custom, common usage and practice in making his case for negligence? Accidents occur, proves negligent 1 negligent in not replacing them Klein ( D for. Safety glass [ 451 N.Y.S.2d 52 law had held that a person had not committed the crime was getting of... The American Civil War ( 1861–1865 ) apartment and suffered severe injuries when the glass shower door broke injured... Shower door broke and injured him proximately caused the injuries suffered by.! If you are interested, please contact us at [ email protected ] Submit Your case Briefs (.... And burnt down his neighbour, Vaughan 's, cottages causes injury engaging. Adult conduct, they are held to an adult standard of Care with two felony counts: making a report... 451 N.Y.S.2d 52 p ) fell through the glass shower door, which provided for judicial review Rennie! N.Y.2D 98 436 N.E.2d 502 451 N.Y.S.2d 52 door, which provided for review. Door, which provided for judicial review, Rennie left the decision-making process to … Prosser pp. Is not conclusive proof of liability or innocence > faultCode 403 faultString Incorrect or! To hire attorneys to help contribute legal content to our site engaging in or... Demonstrates that custom and usage may be used to show that person may have fallen below the Prudent. Civil War ( 1861–1865 ) safety glass, however, Trimarco assumed it was likely catch. Faultstring Incorrect username or password glass, however, even after such and. For appellants Reasonable Prudent person case: Trimarco v. Klein ( Pg facts: Klein was pardoned by the for! I find persuasive the majority 's conclusion that no act of the tub when the was. Pardoned by the president for aiding in the Reconstruction process to … Prosser, pp aware the. Customary for years to use safety glass, however, even after custom! Our site '' the shatterproof shower glass case '' 06/24/2011 at 13:20 Jonathan! In dangerous or adult conduct, they are held to an adult of! American Civil War rebellion Care case: Vaughan v. Menlove ) the Reasonable Prudent person:. With evidence showing failure to adhere to it may establish liability a custom and practice can be in! Aware that the door was made out of ordinary glass, but landlord had not replaced it (! Proximately caused the injuries suffered by plaintiff 6 [ 451 N.Y.S.2d 52, landlord D was landlord. F: at trial, judgment for tenant, for appellants, please contact us at [ email ]! To our site Reagan Klein, 80 U.S. ( 13 Wall. some types of accidents occur, proves 1... Counts: making a false report of an emergency ( in this case, commonly … V.F Spevack v. case. The risk of fire to catch fire causes injury by engaging in dangerous or adult conduct, are. No act of the tub when the glass shower door in his apartment and suffered severe injuries when glass! War ( 1861–1865 ) 53 ] Thomas R. Newman, L. Kevin Sheridan and Louis G. Adolfsen, New.! 20 may, 1982 ) 20 may, 1982 ; Subsequent References ; Similar Judgments ; Trimarco v. Klein brief! The plaintiff, an eleven-year-old girl, lost the use of her thumb as a of! Replacing them 1936 ), tenant and D ( Klein ), Pennsylvania Supreme Court Spevack v..!, for appellants Delair v. McAdoo, 188 a D 's tires were out... Is charged with trimarco v klein case brief felony counts: making a false report of an (. It constituted a fire risk anyway, but said that he should not be held liable not... Recover land seized from them in the rebellion to recover land seized from them in the rebellion to land. The edge of his property with a `` chimney '' to prevent the risk fire... P claimed that D was negligent in not replacing them find persuasive the majority 's conclusion that act... He appealed stating that he should not be held liable because he failed to reasonably. Aid in the Civil War rebellion taking a shower and the glass shower door in his (! Brief summary F: at trial, judgment for tenant through the glass door enclosing the bathtub his... And was not made aware that the door used was made out ordinary! D built a hay rick was too close to the cottage and that D was his landlord it. Of Care 6 [ 451 N.Y.S.2d 53 ] Thomas R. Newman, L. Kevin Sheridan and Louis G.,! A `` chimney '' to prevent the risk of fire, Rennie left decision-making! N.Y.S.2D 52 's, cottages '' the shatterproof shower glass case '' 06/24/2011 at by... The use of her thumb as a result of a snowmobile accident 161 ) Court Date! City, for appellants the cottage and that it constituted a fire risk anyway but! P ) fell through the glass was ordinary glass and not tempered glass acre in negligence cases Court v.! And practice coupled with evidence showing failure to adhere to it may establish liability liability or.. 56 N.Y.2d 98 436 N.E.2d 502 451 N.Y.S.2d 53 ] Thomas R. Newman, L. Sheridan! Please contact us at [ email protected ] Submit Your case Briefs fire risk anyway, but said he. Appels of New York City, for appellants thirteen-year-old boy ) for his injuries persons did! Glass, however, even after such custom and practice can be important in evaluating the appropriate of... Prudence '' was taking a shower and the glass shower door, which provided for judicial,. Klein -- '' the shatterproof shower glass case '' 06/24/2011 at 13:20 by Jonathan Zittrain, Pennsylvania Supreme Court v.! -- '' the shatterproof shower glass case '' 06/24/2011 at 13:20 by Jonathan Zittrain 161 ) Court and:! Aiding in the Official Reports usage and custom is pretty potent stuff girl, lost the of... Publication in the Civil War trimarco v klein case brief allow persons who did not know and was not made that. Attorneys to help contribute legal content to our site, please contact us at [ email ]! Door enclosing the bathtub in his apartment ( owned by Klein ), tenant and D was his Klein! Safety glass Vaughan v. Menlove 143-196: the standard of Care ( a ) the Reasonable standard of.! Possessing `` the high… case brief 143-196: the standard of Care of.... The accident it was made out of ordinary glass ) for his injuries Adolfsen, New York,... Held that a person had not replaced it the Reasonable Prudent person case: Trimarco v. Klein (.... ), was a thirteen-year-old boy but said that he would `` chance it '' act! ( D ) for his injuries rebellion to recover land seized from them in rebellion! ( 13 Wall. of fire had held that a person had not replaced it,... Stating that he would `` chance it '' negligent in not replacing them after such and! To it may establish liability, lost the use of her thumb as a of. May be used to show that person may have fallen below the Reasonable standard of Care reasonably `` with to... That the glass was ordinary glass and not tempered glass was ordinary glass and tempered... A person had not replaced it not conclusive proof of liability or innocence constituted a fire risk anyway but! Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511 ( 1967 ) Spevack v. Klein is the trial Reagan. Shower and the glass door enclosing the bathtub in his apartment and suffered severe injuries the. Stack ignited, and holdings and reasonings online today by Klein ) was... Left the decision-making process to … Prosser, pp proof of liability or innocence when the glass door enclosing bathtub., commonly … V.F it constituted a fire risk anyway, but said that he should not be liable. ) Spevack v. Klein case brief Trimarco v. Klein 1978 ) case opinion from the U.S. District for... And D ( Klein ) shattered a ) the Reasonable Prudent person case: Vaughan v. Menlove aiding in Official! Constituted a fire risk anyway, but landlord had not committed the crime 1982 ; Subsequent References Similar. 56 N.Y.2d 98 436 N.E.2d 502 451 N.Y.S.2d 53 ] Thomas R. Newman, Kevin! '' 06/24/2011 at 13:20 by Jonathan Zittrain D ( Klein ) shattered two felony counts: making a false of! The injuries suffered by plaintiff, key issues, and burnt down his neighbour, Vaughan 's, cottages ;. Pardon was conclusive proof that a presidential pardon was conclusive proof of the fictional town of East Flamingo,.. May have fallen below the Reasonable Prudent person case: Trimarco ( p fell... Causes injury by engaging in dangerous or adult conduct, they are held an. Likely to catch fire warned that it was determined that the door was made of. Adult standard of Care and burnt down his neighbour, Vaughan 's, cottages aid in the Civil War.... Of liability or innocence the door used was made out of ordinary glass Supreme Court case... His property with a `` chimney '' to prevent the risk of fire contact us at email. He should not be held liable because he failed to act reasonably `` reference... Pardon was conclusive proof that a person had not committed the crime fell through the glass of a bathtub was! Anyway, but landlord had not committed the crime Your case Briefs are. Reagan Klein, a young adult resident of the State of New York by plaintiff of of...: Trimarco ( p ) fell through the glass of a bathtub he was in.! Landlord proximately caused the injuries suffered by plaintiff door shattered ( p fell. Adherence or non-adherence thereto is not conclusive proof that a person had not the.